BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2003 A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BIOCHEMICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF TRIOSEPHOSPHATE ISOMERASE FROM TAENIA SOLIUM AND SUS SCROFA
Lucía Jiménez, D. Alejandro Fernández-Velasco, Kaethe Willms, Abraham Landa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We produced the Taenia solium triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) in Escherichia coli and compared its biochemical and immunological properties with those of the commercial TPI from Sus scrofa. Taenia solium TPI is a homodimer composed of two 27-kDa monomers, with a specific activity of 5,683 U/mg and a Km value of 0.758, and S. scrofa TPI is also dimeric with similar monomeric molecular weight, specific activity of 4,227 U/mg, and a Km value of 0.51. The catalytic parameters for the isomerization of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, affinity between TPI monomers, and kinetic thermal denaturation and inactivation were similar for both enzymes. Anti–T. solium TPI antibodies cross-react weakly with Schistosoma mansoni TPI but do not cross-react with S. scrofa, human, or protozoan TPIs. These antibodies inhibited T. solium TPI activity but did not affect S. scrofa enzymatic activity. Immunizations with 1 μg of the T. solium TPI reduced 52% of cysticerci in a mouse–Taenia crassiceps model 1 mo after challenge. Our findings show that T. solium and S. scrofa TPIs possess similar biochemical and enzymatic properties but do not share immunological properties because anti–T. solium TPI antibodies did not recognize S. scrofa TPI. Inhibition of enzyme activity by anti-TPI antibodies suggests that they can be used as inhibitors of the enzyme.

Lucía Jiménez, D. Alejandro Fernández-Velasco, Kaethe Willms, and Abraham Landa "A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BIOCHEMICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF TRIOSEPHOSPHATE ISOMERASE FROM TAENIA SOLIUM AND SUS SCROFA," Journal of Parasitology 89(2), 209-214, (1 April 2003). https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0209:ACSOBA]2.0.CO;2
Received: 8 July 2002; Accepted: 1 September 2002; Published: 1 April 2003
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top